Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Intern Med ; 292(6): 941-956, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2008750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is common after COVID-19. Though the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown, lung perfusion abnormalities could contribute to lingering dyspnea. OBJECTIVES: To detect pulmonary perfusion disturbances in nonhospitalized individuals with the post-COVID condition and persistent dyspnea 4-13 months after the disease onset. METHODS: Individuals with dyspnea and matched healthy controls were recruited for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), a 6-min walk test, and an assessment of dyspnea. The DCE-MRI was quantified using two parametric values: mean time to peak (TTP) and TTP ratio, reflecting the total lung perfusion resistance and the fraction of lung with delayed perfusion, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-eight persons with persistent dyspnea (mean age 46.5 ± 8.0 years, 75% women) and 22 controls (mean age 44.1 ± 10.8 years, 73% women) were included. There was no systematic sex difference in dyspnea. The post-COVID group had no focal perfusion deficits but had higher mean pulmonary TTP (0.43 ± 0.04 vs. 0.41 ± 0.03, p = 0.011) and TTP ratio (0.096 ± 0.052 vs. 0.068 ± 0.027, p = 0.032). Post-COVID males had the highest mean TTP of 0.47 ± 0.02 and TTP ratio of 0.160 ± 0.039 compared to male controls and post-COVID females (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Correlations between dyspnea and perfusion parameters were demonstrated in males (r = 0.83, p < 0.001 for mean TTP; r = 0.76, p = 0.003 for TTP ratio), but not in females. CONCLUSIONS: DCE-MRI demonstrated late contrast bolus arrival in males with post-COVID dyspnea, suggestive of primary vascular lesions or secondary effects of hypoxic vasoconstriction. Since this effect was not regularly observed in female patients, our findings suggest sex differences in the mechanisms underlying post-COVID dyspnea, which warrants further investigation in dedicated trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Feasibility Studies , COVID-19/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Perfusion , Dyspnea/etiology
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(6): 759-766, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1764861

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is the study plan of the Karolinska NeuroCOVID study, a study of neurocognitive impairment after severe COVID-19, relating post-intensive care unit (ICU) cognitive and neurological deficits to biofluid markers and MRI. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed enormous health challenges to individuals and health-care systems worldwide. An emerging feature of severe COVID-19 is that of temporary and extended neurocognitive impairment, exhibiting a myriad of symptoms and signs. The causes of this symptomatology have not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: In this study, we aim to investigate patients treated for severe COVID-19 in the ICU, as to describe and relate serum-, plasma- and cerebrospinal fluid-borne molecular and cellular biomarkers of immune activity, coagulopathy, cerebral damage, neuronal inflammation, and degeneration, to the temporal development of structural and functional changes within the brain as evident by serial MRI and extensive cognitive assessments at 3-12 months after ICU discharge. RESULTS: To date, we have performed 51 3-month follow-up MRIs in the ICU survivors. Of these, two patients (~4%) have had incidental findings on brain MRI findings requiring activation of the Incidental Findings Management Plan. Furthermore, the neuropsychological and neurological examinations have so far revealed varying and mixed patterns. Several patients expressed cognitive and/or mental concerns and fatigue, complaints closely related to brain fog. CONCLUSION: The study goal is to gain a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms and neurological consequences of this new disease, with a special emphasis on neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes, in order to identify targets of intervention and rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Biomarkers , Critical Care , Humans , Survivors/psychology
3.
Radiology ; 297(3): E324-E334, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1042719

ABSTRACT

Background Neurologic complications in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been described, but the understanding of their pathophysiologic causes and neuroanatomical correlates remains limited. Purpose To report on the frequency and type of neuroradiological findings in COVID-19. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, all consecutive adult hospitalized patients with polymerase chain reaction positivity for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and who underwent neuroimaging at Karolinska University Hospital between March 2 and May 24, 2020, were included. All examinations were systematically re-evaluated by 12 readers. Summary descriptive statistics were calculated. Results A total of 185 patients with COVID-19 (62 years ± 14 [standard deviation]; 138 men) underwent neuroimaging. In total, 222 brain CT, 47 brain MRI, and seven spinal MRI examinations were performed. Intra-axial susceptibility abnormalities were the most common finding (29 of 39; 74%, 95% CI: 58, 87) in patients who underwent brain MRI, often with an ovoid shape suggestive of microvascular pathology and with a predilection for the corpus callosum (23 of 39; 59%; 95% CI: 42, 74) and juxtacortical areas (14 of 39; 36%; 95% CI: 21, 53). Ischemic and macrohemorrhagic manifestations were also observed, but vascular imaging did not demonstrate overt abnormalities. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in 19 patients did not reveal consistent asymmetries between hemispheres or regions. Many patients (18 of 41; 44%; 95% CI: 28, 60) had leukoencephalopathy and one patient had a cytotoxic lesion of the corpus callosum. Other findings included olfactory bulb signal abnormalities (seven of 37; 19%), prominent optic nerve subarachnoid spaces (20 of 36; 56%), and enhancement of the parenchyma (three of 20; 15%), leptomeninges (three of 20; 15%), cranial nerves (two of 20; 10%), and spinal nerves (two of four; 50%). At MRI follow-up, regression of leukoencephalopathy and progressive leptomeningeal enhancement was observed in one patient each, respectively, which is suggestive of dynamic processes. Conclusion Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 had a wide spectrum of vascular and inflammatory involvement of both the central and peripheral nervous system. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Nervous System Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Neuroimaging/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Betacoronavirus , Brain/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Spine/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL